Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

il that was available for the studies above. Detailed data related to the performance of companies covered in the studies and other information for the Silber, Management Planning, and FMV studies were available, and as a result, we relied on the information from these three studies as a starting point for our analysis. 2. Fo

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

il that was available for the studies above. Detailed data related to the performance of companies covered in the studies and other information for the Silber, Management Planning, and FMV studies were available, and as a result, we relied on the information from these three studies as a starting point for our analysis. 2. Fo

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

il that was available for the studies above. Detailed data related to the performance of companies covered in the studies and other information for the Silber, Management Planning, and FMV studies were available, and as a result, we relied on the information from these three studies as a starting point for our analysis. 2. Fo