Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

0.0% 10.r/e 1.31 COST OF EOU1TY Equity Risk Small Stock Other Atter-Tas Risk-Free Rate' Premium' Beta Premium' Premiums' Cost of Equity Capital Assn hieing Mold: "ERF Cost of equity — Id+ (ERP'B) + SSp 4 e fl/ST OF DI:BI Coll of debt WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL 4.00% 5.96% 131 2.94

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

0.0% 10.r/e 1.31 COST OF EOU1TY Equity Risk Small Stock Other Atter-Tas Risk-Free Rate' Premium' Beta Premium' Premiums' Cost of Equity Capital Assn hieing Mold: "ERF Cost of equity — Id+ (ERP'B) + SSp 4 e fl/ST OF DI:BI Coll of debt WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL 4.00% 5.96% 131 2.94

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

0.0% 10.r/e 1.31 COST OF EOU1TY Equity Risk Small Stock Other Atter-Tas Risk-Free Rate' Premium' Beta Premium' Premiums' Cost of Equity Capital Assn hieing Mold: "ERF Cost of equity — Id+ (ERP'B) + SSp 4 e fl/ST OF DI:BI Coll of debt WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL 4.00% 5.96% 131 2.94