Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

RP or SSp. The application of such premium is based on consideration of the risk of achieving the forecasted economic, among other factors. Cost of Debt/ Capital Structure At the Valuation Date, the Company had a minimal level of interest-bearing debt, a level of which was expected to continue into the long-term. As s

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

RP or SSp. The application of such premium is based on consideration of the risk of achieving the forecasted economic, among other factors. Cost of Debt/ Capital Structure At the Valuation Date, the Company had a minimal level of interest-bearing debt, a level of which was expected to continue into the long-term. As s

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

RP or SSp. The application of such premium is based on consideration of the risk of achieving the forecasted economic, among other factors. Cost of Debt/ Capital Structure At the Valuation Date, the Company had a minimal level of interest-bearing debt, a level of which was expected to continue into the long-term. As s