Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

working capital is generally needed to fund future growth and, as such, the annual change in requirements represents an additional cash outflow. The DFNWC needs were based on an analysis of the Company's historical DFNWC requirements and normalized guideline company indications, as weft as discussions

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

working capital is generally needed to fund future growth and, as such, the annual change in requirements represents an additional cash outflow. The DFNWC needs were based on an analysis of the Company's historical DFNWC requirements and normalized guideline company indications, as weft as discussions

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

working capital is generally needed to fund future growth and, as such, the annual change in requirements represents an additional cash outflow. The DFNWC needs were based on an analysis of the Company's historical DFNWC requirements and normalized guideline company indications, as weft as discussions