Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

cash flows for its capital owners. Any future sale or transaction is expected to be based on the Company's future cash flow expectations. As such, the Income Approach was the primary methodology used in arriving at a value for the Company's equity. Please see Exhibits F and G for further details related to our an

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

cash flows for its capital owners. Any future sale or transaction is expected to be based on the Company's future cash flow expectations. As such, the Income Approach was the primary methodology used in arriving at a value for the Company's equity. Please see Exhibits F and G for further details related to our an

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

cash flows for its capital owners. Any future sale or transaction is expected to be based on the Company's future cash flow expectations. As such, the Income Approach was the primary methodology used in arriving at a value for the Company's equity. Please see Exhibits F and G for further details related to our an