Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

asted revenues and expenses highlighted above and was detanitheil hi he reawnable bawd on guideline company indications. According to management. the Company\ , term EBIT margin is expected to be higher than the average and median of the guideline company indications as a result of the anticipated increas

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

asted revenues and expenses highlighted above and was detanitheil hi he reawnable bawd on guideline company indications. According to management. the Company\ , term EBIT margin is expected to be higher than the average and median of the guideline company indications as a result of the anticipated increas

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

asted revenues and expenses highlighted above and was detanitheil hi he reawnable bawd on guideline company indications. According to management. the Company\ , term EBIT margin is expected to be higher than the average and median of the guideline company indications as a result of the anticipated increas