Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

rical Financial Analysis Exhibit C: Industry Overview Exhibit D: Economic Overview Exhibit E: Valuation Methodologies Company Valuation (Step 1) Allocation of Company Value to Each Ownership Class (Step 2) Selected Approaches Total Company Valuation Exhibit F: Income Approach Revenue, Expenses, and Profitability Inc

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

rical Financial Analysis Exhibit C: Industry Overview Exhibit D: Economic Overview Exhibit E: Valuation Methodologies Company Valuation (Step 1) Allocation of Company Value to Each Ownership Class (Step 2) Selected Approaches Total Company Valuation Exhibit F: Income Approach Revenue, Expenses, and Profitability Inc

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

rical Financial Analysis Exhibit C: Industry Overview Exhibit D: Economic Overview Exhibit E: Valuation Methodologies Company Valuation (Step 1) Allocation of Company Value to Each Ownership Class (Step 2) Selected Approaches Total Company Valuation Exhibit F: Income Approach Revenue, Expenses, and Profitability Inc