Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

ION REPORT As of Julie 2o, 2011 CONCLUSION Based on the information provided and the analysis conducted, and subject to the attached Statement of Limiting Conditions, it is our opinion that one common share of the Company as of the Valuation Date should be valued as follows: $0.77 (rounded) ZERO DOLLARS AND SEV

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

ION REPORT As of Julie 2o, 2011 CONCLUSION Based on the information provided and the analysis conducted, and subject to the attached Statement of Limiting Conditions, it is our opinion that one common share of the Company as of the Valuation Date should be valued as follows: $0.77 (rounded) ZERO DOLLARS AND SEV

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

ION REPORT As of Julie 2o, 2011 CONCLUSION Based on the information provided and the analysis conducted, and subject to the attached Statement of Limiting Conditions, it is our opinion that one common share of the Company as of the Valuation Date should be valued as follows: $0.77 (rounded) ZERO DOLLARS AND SEV