Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

et value issues. For financial reporting purposes, the standard of value to be utilized in our analysis is fair value as defined in the Glossary of FASB ASC Topic 718 as follows: The amount at which an asset (or liability) could be bought (or incurred) or sold (or settled) in a current transaction between willing

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

et value issues. For financial reporting purposes, the standard of value to be utilized in our analysis is fair value as defined in the Glossary of FASB ASC Topic 718 as follows: The amount at which an asset (or liability) could be bought (or incurred) or sold (or settled) in a current transaction between willing

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

et value issues. For financial reporting purposes, the standard of value to be utilized in our analysis is fair value as defined in the Glossary of FASB ASC Topic 718 as follows: The amount at which an asset (or liability) could be bought (or incurred) or sold (or settled) in a current transaction between willing