Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

dian discounts of 26.0% and 24.0%, respectively, along with the following observations: o There is an exchange effect (New York Stock Exchange and American Stock Exchange listed companies have lower discounts). o The higher the sales of the issuer, the lower the discounts. o Companies with higher earnings have low

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

dian discounts of 26.0% and 24.0%, respectively, along with the following observations: o There is an exchange effect (New York Stock Exchange and American Stock Exchange listed companies have lower discounts). o The higher the sales of the issuer, the lower the discounts. o Companies with higher earnings have low

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

dian discounts of 26.0% and 24.0%, respectively, along with the following observations: o There is an exchange effect (New York Stock Exchange and American Stock Exchange listed companies have lower discounts). o The higher the sales of the issuer, the lower the discounts. o Companies with higher earnings have low