Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO VICTIMS' MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION

the Agreement has not been filed under seal with this Court, the legal authority cited by petitioners regarding sealing of documents, United States I. Ochoa-Vasque 428 F.3d 1015 (11'h Cir. 2005), is inapposite. The parties who negotiated the Agreement, the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein, d

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO VICTIMS' MOTION TO UNSEAL

the Agreement has not been filed under seal with this Court, the legal authority cited by petitioners regarding sealing of documents, United States I. Ochoa-Vasque , 428 F.3d 1015 (11 th Cir. 2005), is completely inapposite. The parties who negotiated the Agreement, the United States Attorney's Office and Jeff

M Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO THEIR MOTION TO USE CORRESPONDENCE

dingly instructed that the district courts must make substantial findings before sealing records in cases before it. For instance, in United States I. Ochoa-Vasque, 428 F.3d 1015 (11th Cir. 2005), it reversed an order from this Court that had sealed pleadings in a criminal case, emphasizing the importance of th