Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

.62 1.71 NA NN 196.1 11311 51013 510.6 (11391 13.11 et» 0331 lab il laTii 13541 Ot01 22595 3.5 DU 23.7 41501 O.% I17.1) (1611 Laine 91.4711.1 11374.2 51.761.1 51./C0.9 6123 5200 5010 6431 4436 1151.2 I.101.1 1.175.5 1145 oto 104 5730 1959 149.7 55/6 (433.1 134

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

.62 1.71 NA NN 196.1 11311 51013 510.6 (11391 13.11 et» 0331 lab il laTii 13541 Ot01 22595 3.5 DU 23.7 41501 O.% I17.1) (1611 Laine 91.4711.1 11374.2 51.761.1 51./C0.9 6123 5200 5010 6431 4436 1151.2 I.101.1 1.175.5 1145 oto 104 5730 1959 149.7 55/6 (433.1 134

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

.62 1.71 NA NN 196.1 11311 51013 510.6 (11391 13.11 et» 0331 lab il laTii 13541 Ot01 22595 3.5 DU 23.7 41501 O.% I17.1) (1611 Laine 91.4711.1 11374.2 51.761.1 51./C0.9 6123 5200 5010 6431 4436 1151.2 I.101.1 1.175.5 1145 oto 104 5730 1959 149.7 55/6 (433.1 134