Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARR A/JOHNSON Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 DEFENDANT'
196, 205, 207 (1995)(purpose of the rules is to encourage plea bargaining, and rules "creat[e], in effect, a privilege of the defendant," quoting 2 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence 1410[05] at 410-43 (1994)); United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir. 2005X"The underlying purpose of Rule 410 is t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
410, "the possibility of self-incrimination would discourage defendants from being completely candid and open during plea negotiations." S.E.C. v. Johnson, 534 F.Supp.2d 63, 66-67 (D.D.C. 2008), quoting United States v. Davis, 617 F.2d 677, 683 (D.C.Cir. 1980). See, e.g., United States v. Mezzanatto, 5
(1995)(purpose of the rules is to encourage plea bargaining, and rules "creat[e], in effect, a EFTA00729521 privilege of the defendant," quoting 2 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence 1410[05] at 410-43 (1994)); United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir. 2005)("The underlying purpose of Rule 410 is
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
TED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 DEFENDANT'
196, 205, 207 (1995)(puipose of the rules is to encourage plea bargaining, and rules "creat[e], in effect, a privilege of the defendant," quoting 2 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence ¶410[05] at 410-43 (1994)); United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir. 2005)("The underlying purpose of Rule 410 is
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
410, "the possibility of self-incrimination would discourage defendants from being completely candid and open during plea negotiations." S.E.C. v. Johnson, 534 F.Supp.2d 63, 66-67 (D.D.C. 2008), quoting United States v. Davis, 617 F.2d 677, 683 (D.C.Cir. 1980). See, e.g., United States v. Mezzanatto, 5
(1995)(purpose of the rules is to encourage plea bargaining, and rules "creat[e], in effect, a EFTA00586218 privilege of the defendant," quoting 2 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence 1410[05] at 410-43 (1994)); United States v. Barrow, 400 F.3d 109, 116 (2d Cir. 2005)("The underlying purpose of Rule 410 is
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (81)
Entities connected to both Scarlett Johansson and J. Weinstein & M. Berger
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,425 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ J.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON892 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON828 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON628 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
United States
LOCATION525 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
George W. Bush
PERSON487 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON422 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON420 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON388 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
Paul Cassell
PERSON379 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
the Southern District
LOCATION340 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
Samantha Power
PERSON192 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ J.
Bradley Cooper
PERSON171 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
MP
Michael J. Pike
PERSON168 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON139 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ J.
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON139 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
Justin Trudeau
PERSON137 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON125 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
JN
JANE DOE NO
PERSON114 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.
Harry Reid
PERSON111 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ J.