Epstein Secrets

ntered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2010 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-IVIARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ.'S RESPONSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PR

Florida Rules of Evidence will prevent use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out th

t that some sort of 2 EFTA00724458 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 221 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/07/2010 Page 3 of 9 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARFtA/JOHNSON underlying settlement discussions should have blocked their release. See Doc. 462, Case 9:08-CV-80119-KAM (Feb. 4, 2010). In fact, Epstein ultimate

Florida Rules of Evidence will prevent use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out th

ntered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2010 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-IVIARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ.'S RESPONSE TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PR

Florida Rules of Evidence will prevent use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out th