Epstein Secrets

n the proposal that was submitted to the Court. If the Defendants want to further contest the issue, they can properl raise the issue by motion. " Johnson v. Smithsonian Inst, 189 F.3d 180, 188 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1999) (finding that the District Court e • in considering a party a necessary party because it

ird party I Plaintiffs Jeffrey Epstein and L.S.J., LLC are represented by Denise Francois, Esq. Defendant Fancelli P eling, Inc., is represented by Treston E. Moore, Esq. 2 For a complete recitation of the factual and procedural history in this matter see this Court's May 1 2011 Memorandum Opinion. Epstein v.

Rosario "may be called upon to provide evidence is not sufficient to make [him a] necessary part)" under Rule 19(a)(1XA). Gibbs Wire & Steel Co. v. Johnson, 255 326, 330 (D. Conn. 2009); see Johnson v. Smithsonian Inst., 189 F.3d 180, 188-89 (2d Cir. 1999) ("Rule 19 does not list the need to obtain ev

ue and correct copy of the foregoing MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ENTERED MAY 24, 2011 to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this r day of -1t.t , 201

osario "may be called upon to provide evidence is not sufficient to make [him a] necessary part[y]" under Rule 19(aX1)(A). Gibbs Wire & Steel Co. v Johnson, 255 F.R.D. 326, 330 (D. Conn. 2009); see Johnson v. Smithsonian Inst., 189 F.3d 180, 188-89 (2d Cir. 1999) ("Rule 19 does not list the need to obt

y of the foregoing MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER ENTERED ON MAY 24, 2011, to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this Is day of tin rI•P ,