Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENORS' REPLY TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOES #2'S RESPONSE IN

ich this case does not. Second, Mohawk was concerned with an interlocutory appeal under the collateral order doctrine of Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949), not with the Perlman exception to the final judgment rule; indeed, it did not so much as mention Perlman. Those two distinctio

o. Fon Neme 6: DELGADO. MARIA DE JESUS DELGADO, MARY D DELGADO. MARIA DEJESUS DELJESUS, MARY D DEJESUS DELGADO. MARIA D DELJESUS, MARY 7: JOHNSON, MARIA CONCEPCION DELGADO, MARIA CONCEPCION JOHNSON. CONNIE DELGADO, CONNIE BLUHM, MA C 8: DELGADO, MIGUEL ANGEL Address SSN Phone DOB

is not immediately appealable [FINS] under the "collateral order" exception to the final judgment rule set forth in Cohen rig v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47. 93 L. Ed. 1528. 69 S. Ct. 1221 (1949). Under Cohen, an interlocutory order is immediately appealable if, inter alia, the orde

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENORS' REPLY TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOES #2'S RESPONSE IN

ich this case does not. Second, Mohawk was concerned with an interlocutory appeal under the collateral order doctrine of Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949), not with the Perlman exception to the final judgment rule; indeed, it did not so much as mention Perlman. Those two distinctio