Epstein Secrets

ocument 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2'S PROTECTIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 15 TO AMEND THEIR PETITION T

ion back in terms of lost evidence due to the passage of time or inadequate time for discovery. See Otto v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2007 WL 3228118, at *2 (E.D. Wis. 2007) (no evidence of prejudice; additional plaintiffs allowed). In fact, some jurisdictions require the opposing party to bear the burden of proving pr

eepers Gang members; pimp recruited underage girls for prostitution and traveled interstate with them. 2422(b); 2423(b) No Information U.S. v. Johnson, 221 F.3d 83 (2"d Cir. 2000) Internet Internet contact with 3 separate minor girls and traveled to engage in illegal . sexual conduct. Pled gui

sexual conduct upon which it is based. 2422(b); 2423; 2252(a)(2) & (a)(4)(B) Not Consummated Sin U.S. v. Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1 1429 (E.D. Wis. 2007) Internet No information available but appears to have showed up for meeting arranged through Internet. 2422(b); 2423; 2252(a)(2) & (a)(4)(B)

ocument 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2'S PROTECTIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 15 TO AMEND THEIR PETITION T

ion back in terms of lost evidence due to the passage of time or inadequate time for discovery. See Otto v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2007 WL 3228118, at *2 (E.D. Wis. 2007) (no evidence of prejudice; additional plaintiffs allowed). In fact, some jurisdictions require the opposing party to bear the burden of proving pr

ocument 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 UNITED STATES JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2'S PROTECTIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 15 TO AMEND THEIR PETITION TO CO

ion back in terms of lost evidence due to the passage of time or inadequate time for discovery. See Oslo I. Milwaukee Cnty.. 2007 WL 3228118. at *2 (E.D. Wis. 2007) (no evidence of prejudice; additional plaintiffs allowed). In fact, some jurisdictions require the opposing party to bear the burden of proving pr

et; arranged to meet her for sex; met her and had sex. Pled guilty. Motion to withdraw guilty plea denied. 2422(b) Consummated D. Nev. U.S. I Johnson, 445 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (D. Nev. 2006) Internet Internet communications; arranged to meet for sex and meet for sex; state charges dropped but fed

TS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE E.D. Wis. U.S. I Davidson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95757 E.D. ( Wis. 2006); U.S. I Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11429 (E.D. Wis. 2007) Internet Defendant pretending to be a 16 yr-old gay teen approached a "15 yr-old male teen" on the Internet; engaged in sexually explicit commu