Epstein Secrets

ts with regards to the g issue whether the litigation privilege bars a 9 malicious prosecution claim. And I have cited to 10 the case Olson vs. Johnson, 961 Sold. 356, the 11 Second DCA's opinion in 2007, after both Levin and 12 Echevarria. And it holds that malicious 13 prosecution claims are

8:12 51:2 trouble (1) United (1) (2) weaken (1) times (2) 51:4 3:17 6:24 7:13 37:5 20:25 32:17 troubled (1) unrelated (3) vis-a-vis (1) WEISS (1) timing (1) 49:13 18:21 19:20 44:23 2:8 15:22 true (2) 22:14 volumes (1) Welcome (1) Title (1) 37:15 62:11 untrue (3) 35:3 3:4 39:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al., Defendants. / Related Cases: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 0

istered Professaonal !reporters 444 West Railroad Avenue Sok 300 West Palm Beads Elcala 33401 IS611335.0220 Aiwa 19.2010 5 ATTERBURY GOLDBERG. WEISS One fkarlake Crew. Stria 1400 250 Australian Avenue South West Palm Beach. Oxide 33901 8 9 10 ATIENTION: JACK GOLDBERGER. ESQ. In Re: DOE EP

ts with regards to the 8 issue whether the litigation privilege bars a 9 malicious prosecution claim. And 2 have cited to 10 the case Olson vs. Johnson, 961 So2d. 356, the 11 Second DCA's opinion in 2007, after both Levin and 12 Echevarria. And it holds that malicious 13 prosecution claims are

trouble (1) United (1) Virginia (2) weaken (1) times (2) 51:4 3:17 6:24 7:13 37:5 20:25 32:17 troubled (1) unrelated (3) vis-a-vis (1) WEISS (1) timing (1) 49:13 18:21 19:20 44:23 2:8 15:22 true (2) 22:14 volumes (1) ' Welcome (1) Tide (1) 37:15 62:11 untrue (3) 35:3 3:4 39