Epstein Secrets

found to be insufficient on its face and not-compliant with the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)7 and TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Edwards has claimed that none of the documents on the disc that were listed on his privilege log had ever been

illustrated in the hearing transcript before the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-BKC- RBR, in In re Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by William Scherer, Razorback's counsel: • "[I]n November we filed a lawsuit in State Co

vilege Log by January 31, 2011. While a Privilege Log was presented timely, Plaintiff objected that it was not in compliance with TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So.2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The Parties met with your Special Master on February 16, 2011 and came to an agreement for production of a more

Associates. Inc. CYedilots Charles Ii ich man on behalf of Ddesident Herbert Stettin Defendant Mary Non Isaac M Mamushamer on behalf of Defendant Rothstein Rosenfeld: Adler• P.A. Mazer on bcludf of Plaintiff/lab:a Mann • editor Iron Mountain Information Management. Inc. Paull McMahon on behalf of Interested Pa

2-KAM Document 14-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2010 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV -MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff, JANE D

dress, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party) , who issues or requests this subpoena, are: Brad Edwards, Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeld( Adler, 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 [email protected]. (954) 522 2346 EFTA01660085 Case 9:09-cv-81092-KA