Epstein Secrets

specific documents withheld with enough detail to facilitate the evaluation of and challenges to the privileges asserted therein. TIG Ins. Cap. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Abbott Laboratories v. Alpha Therapeutic Corp., No. 97-C-1292, 2000 WL 1863543 (N.D. III. Dec. 14, 2000). Moreo

as occurred. The issue of compliance by Fowler White and/or Epstein with the Bankruptcy Court's November 2010 Agreed Order, issued by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray (the "November 2010 Agreed Order"), is squarely and appropriately before the court that issued the Order — the United States Bankruptcy Court for t

found to be insufficient on its face and not-compliant with the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)7 and TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Edwards has claimed that none of the documents on the disc that were listed on his privilege log had ever been

ion was completed. Additionally, The Honorable Donald W. Hafele's stated interest in first allowing the Show Cause proceedings before The Honorable Raymond B. Ray, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, to occur before this Court proceeded with this review. With trial approaching

the existence of a Ponzi scheme and a wrongdoer's 8 EFTA00595537 Case 10-02612-RBR Doc 148-1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 9 of 10 fraudulent intent. See Johnson v. Neilson (In re Slatkin), 525 F.3d 805,811-12 (9th Cir. 2008). Further, 'criminal convictions based on operating a Ponzi scheme establish fraudule

--ritiec)a ° P" 4 I et fase 10-02612-RBR Doc 148-1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 10 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on 1.2 - /4 -10 Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION In re: ROTHSTEIN ROS