Epstein Secrets

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

and median marketability discounts were 33.0% and that nearly 60.0% of the discounts were at or greater than 30.0%. • Moroney Snide. In his study, Moroney reviewed the prices paid for restricted stocks by ten registered investment companies. The average and median marketability discounts indicated by h

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

and median marketability discounts were 33.0% and that nearly 60.0% of the discounts were at or greater than 30.0%. • Moroney Snide. In his study, Moroney reviewed the prices paid for restricted stocks by ten registered investment companies. The average and median marketability discounts indicated by h

Planning , Inc. 1980 -1996 49 27.7% AMY (two-year holding period transactions) 1980 -1997 243 22.3% Hertzel — Smith 1980 -1987 106 20.1% Johnson 1991 - 1995 72 20.0% Our methodology for determining an appropriate adjustment for lack of marketability included the following steps: 1. Exam

and median marketability discounts were 33.0% and that nearly 60.0% of the discounts were at or greater than 30.0%. • Moroney Snide. In his study, Moroney reviewed the prices paid for restricted stocks by ten registered investment companies. The average and median marketability discounts indicated by h