Epstein Secrets

ED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARR A/JOHNSON Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 DEFENDANT'

ndants to talk to prosecutors without sacrificing their ability to defend themselves if no disposition agreement is reached"); Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, Advisory Committee Notes, 1979 Amendment ("the purpose of Fed. R. Ev. 410 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(eX6) [now Rule 11(f)] is to promote the unrestrained candor which pr

410, "the possibility of self-incrimination would discourage defendants from being completely candid and open during plea negotiations." S.E.C. v. Johnson, 534 F.Supp.2d 63, 66-67 (D.D.C. 2008), quoting United States v. Davis, 617 F.2d 677, 683 (D.C.Cir. 1980). See, e.g., United States v. Mezzanatto, 5

ndants to talk to prosecutors without sacrificing their ability to defend themselves if no disposition agreement is reached"); Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, Advisory Committee Notes, 1979 Amendment ("the purpose of Fed. R. Ev. 410 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(6) [now Rule 11(0] is to promote the unrestrained candor which pr

ation Of Vaccine. The Washington Post <https://www.washingtonpost.corn/health/2020/09/22/fda-covid-vaccine-approval- standard/> (9/22, Al, McGinley, Johnson, 14.2M) reports the FDA "is expected to spell out a tough, new standard for an emergency authorization of a coronavirus vaccine as soon as this week

icles/cdc-advisory-panel-to-delay-vote-on-initial-covid-19- vaccine-roll-out-11600772401> (9/22, Loftus, Subscription Publication, 7.57M) reports the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the CDC, will delay a vote on who should get the first doses of potential coronavirus vaccines. The commit

ered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.

ered would be relevant under the facts and theories of the particular case and cannot be obtained except through discovery." See Fed. R. Evid. 412, Advisory Committee Notes to 1994 Amendments, subdivision (c). Defendant has made no such showing in his Motion to Compel to overcome this presumption. Accordingly, Def

TED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 DEFENDANT'

ndants to talk to prosecutors without sacrificing their ability to defend themselves if no disposition agreement is reached"); Fed. It Crim. P. 11, Advisory Committee Notes, 1979 Amendment ("the purpose of Fed. R. By. 410 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(eX6) [now Rule 11(01 is to promote the unrestrained candor which pro

.), Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment (pp. 143-172). New York, NY: Springer. Malloy, L., Johnson, J., & Goodman, G. S. (2013). Children's memory and event reports: The current state of knowledge and best practice. Journal of Forensic Social Work

t, Member Western Psychological Association, Fellow American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC), Founding Member, Previously on Advisory Committee, Research Committee, etc. International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, Member International Society for Traumatic Stress St

(1988). Some deleterious consequences of the act of recollection. Memory and Cognition, 16, 243-251. 14 EFTA00073083 Loftus, E.F., Smith, K.D., Johnson, D.A., & Fiedler, J. (1988). Remembering "when": Errors in dating of autobiographical memories. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.), Pract

cal Society TNG for Psychology, 2006-08 Social Sciences Research Council: Committee on Cognition and Surveys, 1985-90 Bureau of National Affairs, Advisory Committee on Complex Litigation, 1987-1990 Representative from University Faculty to State Legislature, 1976-78 Advisory Comm., Institute of Government and P

410, "the possibility of self-incrimination would discourage defendants from being completely candid and open during plea negotiations." S.E.C. v. Johnson, 534 F.Supp.2d 63, 66-67 (D.D.C. 2008), quoting United States v. Davis, 617 F.2d 677, 683 (D.C.Cir. 1980). See, e.g., United States v. Mezzanatto, 5

ndants to talk to prosecutors without sacrificing their ability to defend themselves if no disposition agreement is reached"); Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, Advisory Committee Notes, 1979 Amendment ("the purpose of Fed. R. Ev. 410 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(6) [now Rule 11(0] is to promote the unrestrained candor which pr