Epstein Secrets

pstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051XXXXMB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marra/Johnson), and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any

o or on behalf of any Plaintiff. 2. All e-mails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwards, Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and Russell Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any Investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or whic

Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2008 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. DECLARATION OF A. MARIE VILLAFARA IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES' RESPONSE 1Q/LCIM'jjiMERGENCirEIMDAEQREIEWICEMEMT QF

in"), by and through his undersigned counsel moves this court for clarification of the record regarding representations made by Plaintiffs counsel, William Berger, Esq., at the September 23, 2009 hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order, and as grounds therefore, would state: 1. Plaintiffs counsel wa

pstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058XXXXMB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marra/Johnson), and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not 2 EFTA00724397 yet filed an action against Jeffrey

y Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. 3. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwards, Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and Russell Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or whic

stein, Palm Beach County Case #50200SCA028058XXXXMB), Jane Doe' (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marra/Johnson), and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any

y Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. 3. All emails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwards, Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and Russell Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or whic

pstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051XXXXMB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marra/Johnson), and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not yet filed an action against Jeffrey Epstein, and any

o or on behalf of any Plaintiff. 2. All e-mails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwards, Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and Russell Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any Investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or whic

ed on attorney-client work product privilege and no privilege log has been prepared. 14. Under the case of TIG Insurance Corporation of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4111 DCA 2001) and its progeny, states that the failure to timely provide a privilege log may be grounds to determine that a

y Plaintiff and the law firm RRA. 3. All emalls, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwards, Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and Russell Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or whic

tein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA0280S8XXXXIVIB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #08-civ-80893-Marra/Johnson), and any other person who is or was represented by Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler that has not yet filed an action against .leffre, Epstein, and any

aintiff and the law firm of RRA. 3. All e-mails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwards, Scott W. Rothstein, William Berger and Russell Adler and/or any attorney or representative of RRA and any Investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or whic

to Take Charge of Property of \4 7/ Epst1 dn to Post a $15 million Bond to Secure Potential ent, in Jane Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893- arra/Johnson. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaint

"pump" w money without any relevance to the existing cla y the RRA clients. 41 /4 I) After EDWARDS joined RRA, EDWARDS and former Circuit Judge William Berger filed and argued motion to make the Non- Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Epstein and USAO public. But, RRA, EDWARDS and Berger, and their three

d Jane Doe 102's Motion for No-Contact Order EFTA01625662 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-8089

partner, Mr. Luther, had a court reporter and a videographe• present. Additionally, Mr. Hill on behalf of C.M..A., Adam Langino on behalf of B.B., William Berger on behalf of three Plaintiffs were present for the deposition. 3 EFTA01625667 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 305 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/