Epstein Secrets

erhaps even stronger" because "the material in question demonstrates or suggests that they had at one time been subject to criminal investigation." Halpern, 181 F.3d at 297. Disclosing personal information about these individuals could result in negative professional and social repercussions, and subjec

.4 (2d Cir. 1985), "even commonly known procedures may be protected from disclosure if the disclosure could reduce or nullify their effectiveness," Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146, 181 (D.D.C. 2004). Exemption 7(E) sets a "low bar for the agency to justify withholding," Blackwell

visitor, that would only heighten that individual's privacy interest in avoiding public disclosure of his or her name and contact information. See Halpern v. F.B.I., 181 F.3d 279, 297 (2d Cir. 1999) (describing privacy interests of third parties "insofar as the material in question demonstrates or sug

ordan v. U.S. Dep't of Justice. See, 668 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir 2011) 6 Judicial Watch v. U.S. Dep't of State, 875 F. Supp. 2d 37 (D.D.C. 2012) 14 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Kimberlin v. DOJ, 139 F.3d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1998) 13 Knight First Amendment Insti

visitor, that would only heighten that individual's privacy interest in avoiding public disclosure of his or her name and contact information. See Halpern v. F.B.I., 181 F.3d 279, 297 (2d Cir. 1999) (describing privacy interests of third parties "insofar as the material in question demonstrates or sug

ordan v. U.S. Dep't of Justice. See, 668 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir 2011) 6 Judicial Watch v. U.S. Dep't of State, 875 F. Supp. 2d 37 (D.D.C. 2012) 14 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Kimberlin v. DOJ, 139 F.3d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1998) 13 Knight First Amendment Insti

visitor, that would only heighten that individual's privacy interest in avoiding public disclosure of his or her name and contact information. See Halpern v. F.B.I., 181 F.3d 279, 297 (2d Cir. 1999) (describing privacy interests of third parties "insofar as the material in question demonstrates or sug

ordan v. U.S. Dep't of Justice. See, 668 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir 2011) 6 Judicial Watch v. U.S. Dep't of State, 875 F. Supp. 2d 37 (D.D.C. 2012) 14 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Kimberlin v. DOJ, 139 F.3d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1998) 13 Knight First Amendment Insti