Epstein Secrets

of secrecy which is waived once public disclosure occurs." In re Motions of Dow Jones & Co., Inc., 142 F.3d 496, 505 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re North, 16 F.3d 1234, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). "[Elven if material concerning the grand jury investigation had been disclosed to the public, the Government

unseal in full, rather, pursuant to Smith and its progeny, the relevant allegations should be redacted. See, e.g., Smith, 656 F.2d at 1107 (ordering Clerk's Office to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records .. . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mr. Smith" and sealing a

secrecy which is waived once public disclosure occurs." In re Motions of Dow Jones & Co., Inc. , 142 F.3d 496, 505 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re North , 16 F.3d 1234, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). "[E]ven if material concerning the grand jury investigation had been disclosed to the public, the Government

seal in full, rather, pursuant to Smith and its progeny, the relevant allegations should be redacted. See, e.g., Smith , 656 F.2d at 1107 (ordering Clerk's Office to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mr. Smith" and sealing a

secrecy which is waived once public disclosure occurs." In re Motions of Dow Jones & Co., Inc. , 142 F.3d 496, 505 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re North , 16 F.3d 1234, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). "[E]ven if material concerning the grand jury investigation had been disclosed to the public, the Government

seal in full, rather, pursuant to Smith and its progeny, the relevant allegations should be redacted. See, e.g., Smith , 656 F.2d at 1107 (ordering Clerk's Office to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mr. Smith" and sealing a

secrecy which is waived once public disclosure occurs." In re Motions of Dow Jones & Co., Inc. , 142 F.3d 496, 505 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re North , 16 F.3d 1234, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). "[E]ven if material concerning the grand jury investigation had been disclosed to the public, the Government

seal in full, rather, pursuant to Smith and its progeny, the relevant allegations should be redacted. See, e.g., Smith , 656 F.2d at 1107 (ordering Clerk's Office to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records . . . any and all identifying reference to or name of Mr. Smith" and sealing a

unty Funeral Home and Crema- tory, Stuart. NU, Jane E., 75, of Port St. Lucie, died Thursday. Yates Funeral Home and Crematory, Port St. Lucie. North, Donald M., 52. of Port St. Lucie, died Wednesday. Yates Funeral Home and Crematory, Port St. Lucie. Service today. Reeb, Norma L,71. of Port S

FOR SEVERABRITY; AND PRCNIONG FOR AN NIKITA DATE. Copies of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments may be viewed by the public at the village Clerk's Office or the tend Development Offke located at 226 Cypress Dom. Palm Springs, Florida, from 9:00 an until A.30 pre Monday through Friday. The public is

type of secrecy which is waived once public disclosure occurs." In re Motions of Dow Jones & Co.. 142 F.3d 496, 505 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re North, 16 F.3d 1234, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). "[Elven if material concerning the grand jury investigation had been disclosed to the public, the Government

unseal in full, rather, pursuant to Smith and its progeny, the relevant allegations should be redacted. See, e.g., Smith, 656 F.2d at 1107 (ordering Clerk's Office to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records . .. any and all identifying reference to or name of Mr. Smith" and sealing a

of secrecy which is waived once public disclosure occurs." In re Motions ofDow Jones & Co., Inc., 142 F.3d 496, 505 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re North, 16 F.3d 1234, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). "[E]ven if material concerning the grand jury investigation had been disclosed to the public, the Government

unseal in flit rather, pursuant to Smith and its progeny, the relevant allegations should be redacted. See, e.g., Smith, 656 F.2d at 1107 (ordering Clerk's Office to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records ... any and all identifying reference to or name of Mr. Smith" and sealing al

of secrecy which is waived once public disclosure occurs." In re Motions ofDow Jones & Co., Inc., 142 F.3d 496, 505 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re North, 16 F.3d 1234, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). "[E]ven if material concerning the grand jury investigation had been disclosed to the public, the Government

unseal in full, rather, pursuant to Smith and its progeny, the relevant allegations should be redacted. See, e.g., Smith, 656 F.2d at 1107 (ordering Clerk's Office to "completely and permanently obliterate and strike from the records ... any and all identifying reference to or name of Mr. Smith" and sealing al