Epstein Secrets

e provided to review some of our issues and concerns. 1 look forward to speaking with you shortly. Sincerely. RFP MLA 000463 EFTA00208944 • • U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MALI lay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LIP Re: ,leffrev Epste

n for doing so by adding charges of money laundering and violations of a money transmitting business to the investigation." Again, I consulted with the Justice Department's Money Laundering Section about my analysis before expanding that scope. The duty attorney agreed with my analysis. RFP MIA 000468 EFTA00208949 •

ey are entitled. Despite this fact. Ms. proposed a Victims Notification letter to be sent to the alleged lialeral victims. Ms. IIMIM has gone even Wither. alleging that the "victims" may make written statements or testily against Mr. Epstein at the sentencing. We lind no basis in law or the Agreement

l, Epstein Was Left Alone for Hours; Guard Was Substitute, N.Y. Times (Aug. 12, 2019), https://nyti.ms/2F9mXzs. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice's Inspector General, and the Bureau of Prisons itself all launched investigations. For his part, the President has suggested that Epstein was "killed

f good faith, this primarily is for determining the need for further fact-finding. See, e.g., Wood v. FBI, 432 F.3d 78, 85 (2d Cir. 2005); see also Wither v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69, 73 (2d Cir. 2009) (presumption does not replace de novo review by courts). The Government contends that the withheld infor

l, Epstein Was Left Alone for Hours; Guard Was Substitute, N.Y. Times (Aug. 12, 2019), https://nyti.ms/2F9mXzs. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice's Inspector General, and the Bureau of Prisons itself all launched investigations. For his part, the President has suggested that Epstein was "killed

f good faith, this primarily is for determining the need for further fact-finding. See, e.g., Wood v. FBI, 432 F.3d 78, 85 (2d Cir. 2005); see also Wither v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69, 73 (2d Cir. 2009) (presumption does not replace de novo review by courts). The Government contends that the withheld infor