Epstein Secrets

to sublet to Fisher. Fisher claims to have entered into the sublease agreement based on Epstein's representations that the sublease was approved by the State Department and that Epstein had properly exercised his right of first refusal to renew the lease. The EFTA00204760 original sublease was to commence May 7, 1

permission to file a motion seeking partial summary judgment against the Subtenants. By stipulation and order dated March 5, 1998, all of the named Subtenants, except for Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group and Ron Soffer, agreed to be bound by any order I entered with respect to Fisher's right to occupy

istopher H. Martin, Jesse Siegel a/k/a Jessie Siegel, Siegel, Martin & Heilbrun, Ron Soffer, and Carmen Tausik (collectively, the "Subtenants"). The Subtenants were added as defendants after the Government learned that Fisher had sublet to them without consent of OFM. Epstein and Fisher oppose ejectment on

to sublet to Fisher. Fisher claims to have entered into the sublease agreement based on Epstein's representations that the sublease was approved by the State Department and that Epstein had properly exercised his right of first refusal to renew the lease. The original sublease was to commence May 7, 1996 and termina

permission to file a motion seeking partial summary judgment against the Subtenants. By stipulation and order dated March 5, 1998, all of the named Subtenants, except for Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group and Ron Soffer, agreed to be bound by any order I entered with respect to Fisher's right to occupy

istopher H. Martin, Jesse Siegel a/k/a Jessie Siegel, Siegel, Martin & Heilbrun, Ron Soifer, and Carmen Tausik (collectively, the "Subtenants"). The Subtenants were added as defendants after the Government learned that Fisher had sublet to them without consent of OFM. Epstein and Fisher oppose ejectment on

egotiations to sublet the Premises to Fisher. Fisher informed Ep- stein, however, that he would not enter into a sublease unless it was approved by the State Department and Fisher could be assured that he could remain in the Premises beyond January 31, 1997. Epstein told Fisher that he had a right of first refusal

rmission to file a motion seeking partial summary judgment against the Sub- tenants. By stipulation and order dated March 6, 1998, all of the named Subtenants, except for Diane Fisher &Wa The Fisher Group and Ron Softer, agreed to be bound by any order I entered with respect to Fish- er's right to occupy

premises to Fisher, and (2) 0FM did not properly terminate Epstein's lease be- Ron Soifer, and Carmen Tausik (collectively, the -Subtenants"). The Subtenants were added as defendants after the Government learned that Fisher had sublet to them without consent of OFM. EFTA00187392 406 27 FEDERAL SUPPL

negotiations to sublet the Premises to Fisher. Fisher informed Epstein, however, that he would not enter into a sublease unless it was approved by the State Department and Fisher could be assured that he could remain in the Premises beyond January 31, 1997. Epstein told Fisher that he had a right of first refusal

permission to file a motion seeking partial summary judgment against the Subtenants. By stipulation and order dated March 5, 1998, all of the named Subtenants, except for Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group and Ron Soffer, agreed to be bound by any order I entered with respect to Fishers right to occupy t

stopher H. Martin, Jesse Siegel a/k/a Jessie Siegel, Siegel, Martin & Heilbrun, Ron Soffer, and Carmen Tausik (collectively, the "Subtenants"). The Subtenants were added as defendants after the Government learned that Fisher had sublet to them without consent of OFM. Epstein and Fisher oppose ejectment on

nced properties would itself constitute blocked Iranian property" (License § 1.4). In addition, under the FMA, "[a]ssets of or under the control of the Department of State, wherever situated, which are used by or held for the use of a foreign mission shall not be subject to attachment, execution, injunction, or simila

e, the validity of which the Government disputes, Epstein did not consent to the use and occupancy of the Premises by Fisher's Subtenants. Fisher's Subtenants hold and continue in possession of the Premises without the Government's permission or consent. On or about November 18, 1997, the Government sent

d properties would itself constitute blocked Iranian property" (License § 1.4). 6. In addition, under the FMA, "[ajssets of or under the control of the Department of State, wherever situated, which are used by or held for the use of a foreign mission shall not be subject to attachment, execution, injunction, or similar

validity of which the Government disputes, Epstein did not consent to the use and occupancy of the Premises by Fisher's Subtenants. 14. Fisher's Subtenants hold and continue in possession of the Premises without the Government's permission or consent. 15. On or about November 18, 1997, the Government

properties would itself constitute blocked Iranian property" (License § 1.4). 33. In addition, under the FMA, "[a]ssets of or under the control of the Department of State, wherever situated, which are used by or held for the use of a foreign mission shall not be subject to attachment, execution, injunction, or similar

e validity of which the Government disputes, Epstein did not consent to the use and occupancy of the Premises by Fisher's Subtenants. 50. Fisher's Subtenants hold and continue in possession of the Premises without the Government's permission or consent. 51. On or about November 18, 1997, the Govemment s