Epstein Secrets

to sublet to Fisher. Fisher claims to have entered into the sublease agreement based on Epstein's representations that the sublease was approved by the State Department and that Epstein had properly exercised his right of first refusal to renew the lease. The EFTA00204760 original sublease was to commence May 7, 1

age, Jr., Esq., Ellen J. Casey, Esq., New York, for Ivan S. Fisher, Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group, and Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir. Ellyn Bank, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Debra Elisa Cohen, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Lawrence D. Gerzog, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Robert Heilbrun, Esq., New York, P

. Works Not Reported in F.Supp. (Cite as: 1998 WL 159055 (S.D.N.Y.)) United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, Lawrence D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbrun, Suzanne McDerm

to sublet to Fisher. Fisher claims to have entered into the sublease agreement based on Epstein's representations that the sublease was approved by the State Department and that Epstein had properly exercised his right of first refusal to renew the lease. The original sublease was to commence May 7, 1996 and termina

age, Jr., Esq., Ellen J. Casey, Esq., New York, for Ivan S. Fisher, Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group, and Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir. Ellyn Bank, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Debra Elisa Cohen, Esq., New York, Pro Se. D. Gerzog, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Robert Heilbrun, Esq., New York, Pro Se. S

t. Works Not Reported in F.Supp. (Cite as: 1998 WL 159055 (S.D.N.Y.)) United States of America, Plaintiff, I. Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbrun, Suzanne McDermott, Chr

negotiations to sublet the Premises to Fisher. Fisher informed Epstein, however, that he would not enter into a sublease unless it was approved by the State Department and Fisher could be assured that he could remain in the Premises beyond January 31, 1997. Epstein told Fisher that he had a right of first refusal

ge, Jr., Esq., Ellen J. Casey, Esq., New York, for Ivan S. Fisher, Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group, and Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir. Ellyn Bank, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Debra Elisa Cohen, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Lawrence D. Gerzog, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Robert Heilbrun, Esq., New York, P

. Works Not Reported in F.Supp. (Cite as: 1998 WL 159055 (S.D.N.Y.)) United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, Lawrence D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbrun, Suzanne McDerm

nced properties would itself constitute blocked Iranian property" (License § 1.4). In addition, under the FMA, "[a]ssets of or under the control of the Department of State, wherever situated, which are used by or held for the use of a foreign mission shall not be subject to attachment, execution, injunction, or simila

f the premises and ejecting Fisher and Epstein from the Premises. SECOND CLAIM Pursuant To The FMA, 22 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq ., Against Defendants Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, Lawrence D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbrun, Suzanne McDe

d properties would itself constitute blocked Iranian property" (License § 1.4). 6. In addition, under the FMA, "[ajssets of or under the control of the Department of State, wherever situated, which are used by or held for the use of a foreign mission shall not be subject to attachment, execution, injunction, or similar

sher has availed himself of the use and benefits of the Premises and has failed to surrender possession of the Premises to the Government. Defendant Ellyn Bank ("Bank") is a resident of the State of New York with a business address at 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York. Bank is named as a defendant be

egotiations to sublet the Premises to Fisher. Fisher informed Ep- stein, however, that he would not enter into a sublease unless it was approved by the State Department and Fisher could be assured that he could remain in the Premises beyond January 31, 1997. Epstein told Fisher that he had a right of first refusal

unter Claimant Ivan Fisher Counter Defendant United States of America Cross Claimant Ivan Fisher Cross Defendant Jeffrey E. Epstein Defendant Ellyn Bank Defendant Debra Elisa Cohen Defendant Diane Fisher doing business as The Fisher Group Defendant Fisher & Soifer also known as Fisher & Sophi

properties would itself constitute blocked Iranian property" (License § 1.4). 33. In addition, under the FMA, "[a]ssets of or under the control of the Department of State, wherever situated, which are used by or held for the use of a foreign mission shall not be subject to attachment, execution, injunction, or similar

n from the Premises. SONY_GM_02742778 EFTA 00229427 EFTA01324993 SECOND CLAIM Pursuant To The FMA, 22 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. Against Defendants Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, Lawrence D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbrun, Suzanne McDe