Epstein Secrets

(A) confirm the existence of and (B) receive any communications between Buckingham Palace or the Office of "Prince Andrew" or "The Duke of York" and the Justice department in relation to the sentencing and case of Epstein. These communications were requested by Brad Edwards in the case referred to above, in a bundle of

died on August 10, 2019. Given that Epstein died in Federal custody while facing Federal charges, and the resulting media attention, we assume that the Department of Justice is well aware of his death. As Jeffrey Epstein is now deceased, any privacy concerns are extinguished. 1. Any and all records from the from the Uni

the sake of 1. Following are links to press releases that are or may be responsive to your 2. Other publicly-available information is available on PACER under docket no. 19 Cr. 0490 (S.D.N.Y.) 3. We draw your attention to the FBI's FOIA vault, https://vaultibi.gov/. Records that the FBI previously

as Commodities Litig.. 235 F.R.D. 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) 2, 8 In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litig., 680 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1982) (per curiam) 18 Lee v. Department of Justice 413 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 2005) 2 L.W. ex rel. Whitson v. Knox County Bd. of Educ. 36 Media L. Rep. 1721 (E.D. Tenn. 2008) 5 Medina v. United Chri

mmon scheme or plan admissible)," F.R.E. 415. and passages from the depositions of Epstein, No. 2, No. 4, No. 5 and 8 This brief may be found on PACER. S.D. Fla. Civil Docket for ME v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case # 9:08-cv- 80893-KAM ("Docket"), DE 140. - 6 - EFTA00728019 herself; at 35-36 (Epstein's

at procedural steps you think we need to bring this matter to a conclusion? That way we can work with you to avoid unnecessary procedural wrangling. The Justice Department is, of course, statutorily obligated to use its "best efforts" to "see that crime victims are ... accorded the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18 U

l) to set up a scheduling conference with your Office to bring the case to an expeditious conclusion. That notice was served on your Office via the PACER electronic filing system. Yet, in spite of that offer to set up a scheduling conference made more than a month ago, your Office said nothing to the

as Commodities Litig.. 235 F.R.D. 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) 2, 8 In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litig., 680 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1982) (per curiam) 18 Lee v. Department of Justice 413 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 2005) 2 L.W. ex rel. Whitson v. Knox County Bd. of Educ. 36 Media L. Rep. 1721 (E.D. Tenn. 2008) 5 Medina v. United Chri

ssible)." F.R.E. 415. and passages from the depositions of Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2, Jane Doe No. 4, Jane Doe No. 5 and 8 This brief may be found on PACER. S.D. Fla. Civil Docket for Jane. Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. Case # 9:08-cv- 80893-KAM ("Docket"), DE 140. - 6 - EFTA00207342 herself; at 35-36 (Eps

at procedural steps you think we need to bring this matter to a conclusion? That way we can work with you to avoid unnecessary procedural wrangling. The Justice Department is, of course, statutorily obligated to use its "best efforts" to "see that crime victims are ... accorded the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18 U

l) to set up a scheduling conference with your Office to bring the case to an expeditious conclusion. That notice was served on your Office via the PACER electronic filing system. Yet, in spite of that offer to set up a scheduling conference made more than a month ago, your Office said nothing to the