Epstein Secrets

e 102. Some of the correspondence that is being withheld by the Government under the deliberative process privilege concerns an investigation that the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) opened with' regard to the Epstein case. This investigation was undertaken at the request of the victim

de: a) All documents, correspondence, and other information collected by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and any other component of the Justice Department (including the FBI) in response to the victims' letter; b) All documents, correspondence, witness statements, and other information collected as pa

tment accordingly sent various issues related to the Epstein case (and, on information and belief, issues related to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2) to the Department of Justice and to a United States Attorney's Office in another District. Please provide all documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the pote

n trust funds, contending that the federal agencies are "often charged with protecting competing interests, including some potentially adverse to a Tribe's interest." Id. at 247. The district court rejected these arguments, finding the claim "that the government's sovereign interests somehow negate or

8-cv-80736-KAM Document 226 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 9 of 18 possessed information reflecting contacts between and persons working at the Justice Department that related to the Epstein investigation. See Government's Answers to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions (RFA's), fi 15-17.

n trust funds, contending that the federal agencies are "often charged with protecting competing interests, including some potentially adverse to a Tribe's interest." Id. at 247. The district court rejected these arguments, finding the claim "that the government's sovereign interests somehow negate or

ly raised the point about other attorneys apart from Reinhart. The victims noted that, in the Government's answers to RFA #22(b), it admitted that "[t]he Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility and/or other Government entities have collected information about . . . [o]ther government [attorneys'] . . .

in trust by the Government because of "common-law trust principles." Id. at 2325. In rejecting the tribe's claim, the Supreme Court held that "the Tribe must point to a right conferred by statute . . . in order to obtain otherwise privilege information from the Government against its wishes." Id. (e