Epstein Secrets

' In October 2020, the parties reached an agreement to resolve plaintiff's challenge to the adequacy of BOP's search for records, pursuant to which the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General ("OIG") returned to BOP electronic copies of records BOP had provided to OIG in connection with the investigation into the

t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t

' In October 2020, the parties reached an agreement to resolve plaintiff's challenge to the adequacy of BOP's search for records, pursuant to which the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General ("OIG") returned to BOP electronic copies of records BOP had provided to OIG in connection with the investigation into the

t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t

' In October 2020, the parties reached an agreement to resolve plaintiff's challenge to the adequacy of BOP's search for records, pursuant to which the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General ("OIG") returned to BOP electronic copies of records BOP had provided to OIG in connection with the investigation into the

t 1, United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 22; Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Michael Thomas's Motion to Compel, United States v. Noel, at 8-9, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 35. The fact that materials at issue have been disclosed t

told the U.S. Attorney's Office that during the 43 The OIG does not have the authority to compel or subpoena testimony from individuals who are not Department of Justice employees. 34 The OIG did not investigate the factual accuracy of this proffer. We note that there are methods by which a call to the 646 area code

not observe on the recorded video any CO or other individual enter any of the SHU tiers, which is consistent with CO Tova Noel and Material Handler Michael Thomas's admissions to the OIG that the SHU rounds and counts were not conducted during that time frame. At approximately 6:28 a.m., an unidentified officer

told the U.S. Attorney's Office that during the 43 The OIG does not have the authority to compel or subpoena testimony from individuals who are not Department of Justice employees. 34 The OIG did not investigate the factual accuracy of this proffer. We note that there are methods by which a call to the 646 area code

not observe on the recorded video any CO or other individual enter any of the SHU tiers, which is consistent with CO Tova Noel and Material Handler Michael Thomas's admissions to the OIG that the SHU rounds and counts were not conducted during that time frame. At approximately 6:28 a.m., an unidentified officer