Epstein Secrets

told the U.S. Attorney's Office that during the 43 The OIG does not have the authority to compel or subpoena testimony from individuals who are not Department of Justice employees. 34 The OIG did not investigate the factual accuracy of this proffer. We note that there are methods by which a call to the 646 area code

ralized Control Center. Access into the SHU was further controlled by a second locked door (Main Interior Entry Door), to which a limited number of Correctional Officers (CO) had keys while on duty. Secondary access to the SHU was controlled by a locked door. That door was opened remotely by a staff member in the centra

ld the U.S. Attorney’s Office that during the 33 The OIG does not have the authority to compel or subpoena testimony from individuals who are not Department of Justice employees. 34 The OIG did not investigate the factual accuracy of this proffer. We note that there are methods by which a call to the 646 area co

alized Control Center. Access into the SHU was further controlled by a second locked door (Main Interior Entry Door), to which a limited number of Correctional Officers (CO) had keys while on duty. Secondary access to the SHU was controlled by a locked door. That door was opened remotely by a staff member in the centr

told the U.S. Attorney's Office that during the 43 The OIG does not have the authority to compel or subpoena testimony from individuals who are not Department of Justice employees. 34 The OIG did not investigate the factual accuracy of this proffer. We note that there are methods by which a call to the 646 area code

ralized Control Center. Access into the SHU was further controlled by a second locked door (Main Interior Entry Door), to which a limited number of Correctional Officers (CO) had keys while on duty. Secondary access to the SHU was controlled by a locked door. That door was opened remotely by a staff member in the centra