4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
opportunity. Lingle v. Dion, 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore 786 So.2d 521 (Fla. 2001). Courts shall be open to any person for the redress of any injury and justice shall be administered without sale
Page 9 of 11 if the plaintiff has a substantial privacy interest that outweighs the presumption of openness in judicial proceedings. Id., citing, Doe v. Frank, 951 F.2d 320, 323 (11th Cir. 1992)(requiring complaint to include the names of the parties serves more than administrative convenience, it protects
opportunity. Lingle v. Dion, 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 41h DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore, 786 So.2d 521 (Fla. EFTA00221216 Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Page 8 of 12 2001). Courts sha
g the legitimate interests of either party. 6 EFTA00221215 Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Page 7 of 12 Doe v. Frank, 951 F.2d at 323. Plaintiff does not fall under any of the factors. Moreover, even if she did meet one of the factors, "[t]he fact that [a] Doe [Pl
opportunity. Lingle v. Dion 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore, 786 So.2d 521 (Fla. 2001). Courts shall be open to any person for the redress of any injury and justice shall be administered without sal
6 of 11 decide if the plaintiff has a substantial privacy interest that outweighs the presumption of openness in judicial proceedings. Id., citing, Doe v. Frank, 951 F.2d 320, 323 (11" Cir. 1992)(requiring complaint to include the names of the parties serves more than administrative convenience, it protects
opportunity. Lingle v. Dion, 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore, 786 So.2d 521 (Fla. 7 EFTA00175248 6se 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Page 9 of 12 others, diminis
bstantial privacy interests JANE DOE has must outweigh the customary and constitutionally embedded presumption of openness to judicial proceedings. Doe v. Frank, 951 F.2d at 323; Doe v. Berostron, 2009 WL 528623 (C.A.9(Or.))(denying request to proceed anonymously in civil action by Plaintiff where Plaintiff
Entities connected to both George Mitchell and Doe v. Frank

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONFederal Court
ORGANIZATIONMichael J. Pike
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSONVermette
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSONAtterbury Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATIONSweetland
PERSONLingle
PERSONHickman
PERSONBrandsmart U.S.A.
ORGANIZATIONBear Stops
ORGANIZATIONRostker
PERSOND. Ct
ORGANIZATIONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATION