Epstein Secrets

taking of these depositions, which serve no purpose, to be an abuse of the litigation process. You took the deposition of former chief of police, Michael Reiter on November 23, 2009. I don't recall one question which you ever asked of the chief regarding your client, B.B. Yet, you spent 4 or 5 hours questio

ion obtained from the deposition which can be utilized as admissible evidence at the time of the B.B. trial. Taking the deposition of former Chief Reiter is another example of an abuse of the judicial process as it relates to your client's claim against Mr. Epstein. Her case will rise and fall on the

the B.B. trial. Taking the deposition of former Chief Reiter is another example of an abuse of the judicial pr

EL BURMAN. P.A.LI GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA. ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR.. $ BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER MARKT. LUTTIER. PA. JEFFREY C. PEPIN MICHAEL J. PIKE HEATHER MCNAMARA RUDA DAVID A. YAREMA 'FLORIDA BOARD CIRTNIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER ?ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA AND COIORADO BURMAN, CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN.LLe YOUR

, he has no personal knowledge regarding any relevant or material fact in this case. His only involvement was as related by former Palm Beach Chief Michael Reiter at his deposition. If your client had any contact with Mr. Goldsmith through Mr. Epstein, then clearly, the deposition may have some relevance. How

Mr. Epstein, then clearly, the deposition may have some relevance. However, if your sole purpose is to establish that Mr. Goldsmith contacted Chief Reiter on behalf of Mr. Epstein for whatever reason, it is an issue which is not relevant, or material, nor will any associated with it ever be admissible

ose is to establish that Mr. Goldsmith contacted Chief Reiter on behalf of Mr. Epstein for whatever reason, it

CHAEL BURMAN. PA" GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA ROBERT D. CRITTON. Th.. PA' BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER MARK T. LUTTI ER. PA JEFFREY C PEPIN MICHAEL J. PIKE HEATHER MCNAMARA RUDA DAVID A. YAREMA 'NORM A BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL ULU. LAWYER 2ADMITTEDd73WiC6C1; Mali Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Sui

contemporaneous with this Motion: a. Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein (Ex. B); b. Deposition of (Ex. C); c. Deposition of Palm Beach Police Chief Reiter (Ex. D); d. Interrogatory responses of Plaintiff, B.B. (Ex. E); 13. Plaintiffs claim for Punitive Damages is further supported because Defendant

of (Ex. C); c. Deposition of Palm Beach Police Chief Reiter (Ex. D); d. Interrogatory responses of Plaintif

L BURMAN. PA." GREGORY W. COLEMAN. RA- ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR.. PA. ' BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER MARK T. LUTTIER. PA. JEFFREY C. PEPIN MICHAEL J. PIKE HEATHER MCNAMARA RUDA DAVID A. YAREmA 'FLORIDA WAIN) CIRTIFItD CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER 2ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA AND COLORADO BY HAND DELIVERY Judge Donald Hafele Fi

Stedman, PA., Orlando, and Jack E. Carstensen of Rigdon, Alexander & Rigdon, L.L.P., Cocoa, for Petitioner. '707 Julie H. Littlty-Rubin, of Lytal, Reiter, Clark, Fountain & Williams, L.L.P., West Palm Beach, and Robert M. Moletteire, of Graham, Moletteire, 'futile & Torpy, PA., Melbourne, for Respon

MICHAEL BURMAN. PA! GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA. ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR.. PA! BERNARD LEBEDEKER MARK T. LUTHER. PA. JEFFREY C. PEPIN MICHAEL J. PIKE HEATHER MCNAMARA RUDA FLOIGOA BOARD anrrusso CIVIL TRIAL lAWYER et z-N--,.\ .. 2.) \ '- ? BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN LLP A LIMITED LIABR,TT'Y PARTNERSHIP

Lee Stedman, PA., Orlando, and Jack E. Carstensen of Rigdon, Alexander & Rigdon, M, Cocoa, for Petitioner. '707 Julie H. Littity-Rubin of Lytal, Reiter, Clark, Fountain & Williams, West Paint Beach, and Robert M. Moletterre, o Graham, Moletteire, 'futile & Torpy, PA., Melbourne, for Respondents.

MICHAEL BURMAN. PA! GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA. ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR.. PA! BERNARD LEBEDEKER MARK T. LUTHER. PA. JEFFREY C. PEPIN MICHAEL J. PIKE HEATHER MCNAMARA RUDA FLOIGOA BOARD anrrusso CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER a eli-72-\•--,.\ \ '- ? - : 11.-,-.75C..-.:ca...., -4-•-1/4) , .... . - BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER &