Epstein Secrets

ew attention of the highest-ranking law enforcement officials in Palm Beach County. Frustrated during the course of the investigation, Police Chief Michael Reiter even penned a letter to State Attorney Barry Krischer, calling his office's handling of the investigation "highly unusual" and suggesting that he d

ourse of the investigation, Police Chief Michael Reiter even penned a letter to State Attorney Barry Kris

fact, the U.S. Attorney's Office has taken no position on this matter throughout the lower court proceedings and specifically informed counsel for E.W. that it had no position (A-18 at p. 7,11. 10-14.) At that hearing, the Court found that the proper procedures to initially seal the records were not

Inc. d/b/a The Palm Beach Post ("the Post") its attorneys' fees and costs in responding to this petition. JURISDICTION The Post adopts Respondent E.W.'s statement concerning jurisdiction. Insofar as this Court finds jurisdiction, the Post requests that this Court expedite its consideration of this

s frustrated with the way the state attorney's office had handled th·e case. On the same day the warr;:mts were requested, P·:ilm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter wrote ·a.letter to State Attorney Barry Kris ch er suggesting he disqualify·himself from the case if he, woul.d ;not act, Two weeks ,la,ter, R:e_c

ing of this matter has taken and consider if good and sufficient reason exists to require your disqualification from the prosecution of these cases,” Reiter wrote in a May 1 memo, to Krischer. While not commenting specifically on the Epstein case, Mike Edmondson, spokesman for the state attorney, said his

nt against Epstein was unsealed this week, Police Chief Reiter referred the matter to the FBI. “We’ve received t

h to do so today. "It.is against public policy for these documents to be have been sealed and hidden from public scrutiny. As a member of the public, E.W. has a right to have these documents unsealed," wrote former CircuitJudge Bill Berger, now in private practice-and representing one ofthe women. The P

becoming en Industrial Arts teethe, and coach for32 yore He is survived by his wife: Pam, Altoona. FL sons- Abner MOM, k. West Palm Beach, D. and Michael digbio. Tallahassee. Ft. brothers: Dante Plebe. West Palm Beach, Ft. Charlie B.gbe. Keystone Heights, F1, arcaloSthadit Bight Live Oeli, FL sist

n4xAekWrWGFA... 6/11/2009 EFTA00259946 Jeffrey Epstein documents sealed - for now 'West Palm Beach News, South Florida Break... Page 3 of 3 EYTAL,REITER,CLARK FOUNTAIN n WILLIAMS Scripps TV Station Group O 2009 The E.W. Scripps Co. Privacy Policy (Updated) I Terms of Use (Updated) I EEO gINERGgg,

th to do so today. "It is against public policy for these documents to have been sealed and hidden from public scrutiny. As a member of the public, E.W. has the right to have these documents unsealed," wrote former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, now in private practice and representing one of the women.

CA037319XXXX MB AB, Depo. of Police Chief Michael Reiter at 80 (Palm Beac Cty. Cir. Ct. Nov. 23, 2009).

z set up, then cancelled, Epstein interviews with the police "several times." See B.B. Epstein, No. 502008CA037319XXXX MB AB, Depo. of Police Chief Michael Reiter at 80 (Palm Beac Cty. Cir. Ct. Nov. 23, 2009). 15 EFTA00191417 Brunel. In 2009, undersigned counsel (Brad Edwards, representing Jane Doe) served

z] who you know to have stayed at Jeffery Epstein's house on many occasions, correct? And also somebody who you know to have been at the house when E.W. was in Jeffrey Epstein's bedroom getting sexually abused, correct? 26 Of course, in a proceeding such as this one, the victims are entitled to an i

calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05197.05199 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne Michael Reiter info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne Michael Reiter info Work product; attorney/client privilege;

ed to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 07025-07027 10/29/2009 Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell ■. and E.W. v. Epstein — Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evide

• • !iil .. . • i : ' i ' 1• I District:, spo S. Austtallari Ave., Ste. 400,West Palm Beach, FL 3314?1:(11;x: 5614820-8777); , • ir • 2' ' Michael i';;IcAnliffe,i'Esq;, and Judith Ste anon Arco, Esq., StutAtitsits ey's Office - West • : ' I I Palm Beach, 401 NoithI.)ixie Highway, Jut Palm B

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas, They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.