Epstein Secrets

43:9,16 56:7 62:19 52:7,10 source (2) stayed (2) separated (I) 63:8,10 64:2 single-famil... 16:17 73:18 31:12 75:23 49:8 64:8 71:20 67:7 South (1) STIPULAT... September (... 71:23 72:2 sink (1) 2:10 3:3,17 4:6,12 6:19 8:7,25 76:9 48:18 space (2) 4:18,24 9:5,9,23 35:2 showed (1)

ramar Project? A. Again, I have not seen this document, but actually it seems to be as you described it. Q. At that time the principal place of Terramar Project was at ew York, New York? A. Again, it was just the address that we had of convenience. Q. Did you have another address for the Terramar Proj

received and marked as Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 for identification, as of this date, by the reporter.) Q. In 2012 the principal place of business Terramar Project was located at New York, New York? A. Again. That would be just an address of convenience, but yes. Q. In 2013, was the principal place of bus

19 14:10 18:2,6 20:2 23:8 24:17 25:18 26:17 31:14 31:21 47:3 57:14,22 59:21 61:12 62:8 64:15 74:22 76:17 77:10,11 source (2) 16:17 73:18 South (1) 2:10 space (2) 69:19,21 speak (1) 28:18 speakers (6) 12:16 14:15 28:11,15,16 73:18 speaking (1) 7:15 specific (1) 15:6 specifically

ramar Project? A. Again, I have not seen this document, but actually it seems to be as you described it. Q. At that time the principal place of Terramar Project was at 116 East 65th Street, New York, New York? A. Again, it was just the address that we had of convenience. Q. Did you have another address

received and marked as Plaintiff's Exhibit 11 for identification, as of this date, by the reporter.) Q. In 2012 the principal place of business Terramar Project was located at 116 East 65th Street, New York, New York? A. Again. That would be just an address of convenience, but yes. Q. In 2013, was the p

19 14:10 18:2,6 20:2 23:8 24:17 25:18 26:17 31:14 31:21 47:3 57:14,22 59:21 61:12 62:8 64:15 74:22 76:17 77:10,11 source (2) 16:17 73:18 South (1) 2:10 space (2) 69:19,21 speak (1) 28:18 speakers (6) 12:16 14:15 28:11,15,16 73:18 speaking (1) 7:15 specific (1) 15:6 specifically

ramar Project? A. Again, I have not seen this document, but actually it seems to be as you described it. Q. At that time the principal place of Terramar Project was at 116 East 65th Street, New York, New York? A. Again, it was just the address that we had of convenience. Q. Did you have another address

received and marked as Plaintiff's Exhibit 11 for identification, as of this date, by the reporter.) Q. In 2012 the principal place of business Terramar Project was located at 116 East 65th Street, New York, New York? A. Again. That would be just an address of convenience, but yes. Q. In 2013, was the p