Epstein Secrets

aserDynamics, Inc.'. Quanta Computer, Inc., 694 F.3d 51, 78 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (reversing district court for admitting settlement agreement at trial); Apple, Inc. Samsung Electronics Co., Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160337, at **51-54 (barring parties from relying

1 (S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement on relevancy grounds); Duncan,. Phoenix Supported Living, Inc., No. 2:05-cv-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2006), 2006 US. Dist. LEXIS 66742, at "9-11 (finding settlement communications non-discoverable as "not .. likely

serDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computes; Inc., 694 F.3d 51, 78 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (reversing district court for admitting settlement agreement at trial); Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160337, at **51-54 (barring parties from relyi

(S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement on relevancy grounds); Duncan v. Phoenix Supported Living, Inc., No. 2:05-cv-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2006), 2006 US. Dist. LEXIS 66742, at "9-11 (finding settlement communications non-discoverable as "not .. likely

erDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computes; Inc., 694 F.3d 51, 78 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (reversing district court for admitting settlement agreement at trial); Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case No. 11-CV-01846- LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160337, at **51-54 (barring parties from

(S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement on relevancy grounds); Duncan v. Phoenix Supported Living, Inc., No. 2:05cvl W.D. ( N.C. Sept. 12, 2006), 2006 U.S. Dist. (continued...) -5- EFTA00605755 rarely admissible as evidence at trial, see, e.g, Lase

aserDynamics. Inc. Quanta Computer, Inc., 694 F.3d 51, 78 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (reversing district court for admitting settlement agreement at trial); Apple, Inc.'. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case No. 1 -CV-01846- LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160337, at "51-54 (barring parties from re

31 (S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement on relevancy grounds); Duncan' Phoenix Supported Living, Inc., No. 2:05cvl (W.D. N.C. Sept. 12, 2006), 2006 U.S. Dist. (continued...) -5- EFTA00191294 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 247 Entered on FLSD Dock