Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
cause double jeopardy is meant to protect a defendant from successive punishments for the same offense, a multiplicitous count does not violate the Clause unless and until sentence is imposed. See Josephberg, 459 F.3d at 355 ("Where there has been no prior conviction or acquittal, the Double Jeopardy
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
cause double jeopardy is meant to protect a defendant from successive punishments for the same offense, a multiplicitous count does not violate the Clause unless and until sentence is imposed. See Josephberg, 459 F.3d at 355 ("Where there has been no prior conviction or acquittal, the Double Jeopardy
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
cause double jeopardy is meant to protect a defendant from successive punishments for the same offense, a multiplicitous count does not violate the Clause unless and until sentence is imposed. See Josephberg, 459 F.3d at 355 ("Where there has been no prior conviction or acquittal, the Double Jeopardy
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
cause double jeopardy is meant to protect a defendant from successive punishments for the same offense, a multiplicitous count does not violate the Clause unless and until sentence is imposed. See Josephberg, 459 F.3d at 355 ("Where there has been no prior conviction or acquittal, the Double Jeopardy
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (267)
Entities connected to both Boston and Clause
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON61 w/ Boston·8 w/ Clause
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON17 w/ Boston·6 w/ Clause
United States
LOCATION15 w/ Boston·7 w/ Clause
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON16 w/ Boston·5 w/ Clause
Bradley Edwards
PERSON12 w/ Boston·7 w/ Clause
the Southern District
LOCATION12 w/ Boston·7 w/ Clause
North Carolina
LOCATION12 w/ Boston·6 w/ Clause
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON12 w/ Boston·6 w/ Clause
Palm Beach
LOCATION14 w/ Boston·3 w/ Clause
John F. Kennedy
PERSON15 w/ Boston·2 w/ Clause
Michael Jackson
PERSON11 w/ Boston·6 w/ Clause
Colorado
LOCATION10 w/ Boston·7 w/ Clause
Oregon
LOCATION12 w/ Boston·5 w/ Clause
LB
Leon Black
PERSON10 w/ Boston·7 w/ Clause
Adriana Ross
PERSON11 w/ Boston·6 w/ Clause
George Mitchell
PERSON10 w/ Boston·6 w/ Clause
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON11 w/ Boston·5 w/ Clause
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON11 w/ Boston·5 w/ Clause
Sacramento
LOCATION11 w/ Boston·5 w/ Clause
Rivera
PERSON9 w/ Boston·6 w/ Clause