6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Feb 12, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Richard Joslin < > wrote: 1. Attached is structure chart prepared by Akin 2. The plane is FAA registered currently with Rance. It is dated back to purchase date. 3. If plane were to be transferred from Rance to Avioneta, the transfer would take place in a sales tax free ju
ays that if LEON is owner and operates under Part 91, there is no NJ sales tax on Part 91 operations. Further there is no sales tax on transfer from Avioneta/ Rance to LDB. Both confirmed with outside counsel 5. Where is the sloppiness? 6. Why are you egging me on to quit? EFTA00695210 From: Jeffrey E. [mai
000 Attachments: Structure_Chart_-_N624N_Updated.pdf 1. Attached is structure chart prepared by Akin 2. The plane is FAA registered currently with Rance. It is dated back to purchase date. 3. If plane were to be transferred from Rance to Avioneta, the transfer would take place in a sales tax free ju
ays that if LEON is owner and operates under Part 91, there is no NJ sales tax on Part 91 operations. Further there is no sales tax on transfer from Avioneta/ Rance to LDB. Both confirmed with outside counsel 5. Where is the sloppiness? 6. Why are you egging me on to quit? From: jeffrey E. [mailto: Sent: Frid
2016 at 11:19 AM, Richard Joslin «mailto > wrote: 1. Attached is structure chart prep=red by Akin 2. The plane is FAA registered curr=ntly with Rance. It is dated back to purchase date. 3. If plane were to be transferred =rom Rance to Avioneta, the transfer would take place in a sales tax free j
ays that if LEON is ow=er and operates under Part 91, there is no NJ sales tax on Part 91 operati=ns. Further there is no sales tax on transfer from Avioneta/ Rance to LDB. Both confirmed with outside counsel=/u> 5. Where is the sloppiness?<=> 6. Why are you egging me on to quit= From: jeffrey E. [mailto:je
, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Richard Joslin= wrote: 1. Attached is structure chart prep=red by Akin 2. The plane is FAA registered curr=ntly with Rance. It is dated back to purchase date. 3. If plane were to be transferred =rom Rance to Avioneta, the transfer would take place in a sales tax free j
ays that if LEON is ow=er and operates under Part 91, there is no NJ sales tax on Part 91 operati=ns. Further there is no sales tax on transfer from Avioneta/ Rance to LDB. Both confirmed with outside counsel=/u> 5. Where is the sloppiness?<=> 6. Why are you egging me on to quit= From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:je
b 12, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Richard Joslin= < > wrote: 1. Attached is structure chart prep=red by Akin 2. The plane is FAA registered curr=ntly with Rance. It is dated back to purchase date. 3. If plane were to be transferred =rom Rance to Avioneta, the transfer would take place in a sales tax free
ays that if LEON is ow=er and operates under Part 91, there is no NJ sales tax on Part 91 operati=ns. Further there is no sales tax on transfer from Avioneta/ Rance to LDB. Both confirmed with outside counsel=/u> 5. Where is the sloppiness?<=> 6. Why are you egging me on to quit= From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:je
Attachments: Structure Chart - N624N Updated.pdf 1. Attached is structure chart prepared by Akin 2. The plane is FAA registered currently with Rance. It is dated back to purchase date. 3. If plane were to be transferred from Rance to Avioneta, the transfer would take place in a sales tax free ju
ays that if LEON is owner and operates under Part 91, there is no NJ sales tax on Part 91 operations. Further there is no sales tax on transfer from Avioneta/ Rance to LDB. Both confirmed with outside counsel 5. Where is the sloppiness? 6. Why are you egging me on to quit? From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacatio
Entities connected to both France and Avioneta/ Rance