Epstein Secrets

ndant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #4. 5. On May 1, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 6. On May 3, 2004, Defendant caused one or mo

(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove

s date with the young prostitute even if the date never happened. And that would be so even if the prostitute were 17 (and despite the fact that in New York the age of consent is 17, since prostitution is a "sexual offense" in New York). Clearly, these are applications and outcomes Congress did not conte

travel." Evidence related to the "grooming process" was relevant to whether the defendants had the illicit intent necessary under 2423(b). 5) U.S.' Scisum, 32' 3d 1479 (10th Cir. 1994). For a violation of 2423(a), the government must prove that the defendant had formed the intent to have the victim eng

(citing United States v. Griffith , 284 F.3d 338, 351 (2d Cir. 2002); United States v. Taylor , 239 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Scisum , 32 F.3d 1479, 1485-86 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Hamilton , 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1982)). Instead, the court concluded that the Gove

ndant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. 5. On May 1, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. EFTA02857788 6. On May 3, 2004, Defendant c