Epstein Secrets

pt the relevant rule of New York landlord-tenant law for purposes of deciding the remaining issue in this dis- pute, and hold that, consistent with New York law, OFM was entitled to arbitrarily withhold its consent to Epstein's request to sublet the Premises to Fisher. Even assum- ing OFM had a hidden a

d in part and denied in part. I. Federal Courts .3=409 In diversity action, federal court sitting in New York must apply New York law, including New York's choice-of-law rules. 2. Contracts e=s144 Under New York's choice-of-law rules, when court is construing meaning of con- tract, court should apply

t may not be introduced to create ambiguity. Arthur M. Handler, Whitman & Ransom, New York City, for plaintiff. Elliot Silverman, Cold & Wachtel, New York City, for defendant. ORDER CONBOY, District Judge: We have before us an action for breach of contract. Plaintiff Michael R. Stroll ("Stroll") see

rmission to file a motion seeking partial summary judgment against the Sub- tenants. By stipulation and order dated March 6, 1998, all of the named Subtenants, except for Diane Fisher &Wa The Fisher Group and Ron Softer, agreed to be bound by any order I entered with respect to Fish- er's right to occupy

premises to Fisher, and (2) 0FM did not properly terminate Epstein's lease be- Ron Soifer, and Carmen Tausik (collectively, the -Subtenants"). The Subtenants were added as defendants after the Government learned that Fisher had sublet to them without consent of OFM. EFTA00187392 406 27 FEDERAL SUPPL

York, Pro Se. Jessie Siegel a/k/a Jesse Siegel, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Siegel, Martin & Heilbrun, By Robert Heilbrun, Esq., A Partner of the Firm, New York, Pro Se. Ron Soffer, Esq., New York, Pro Se. Carmen Tausik, Esq., New York, Pro Se. OPINION CHIN, D.J. *1 In this case, the United States (the "

permission to file a motion seeking partial summary judgment against the Subtenants. By stipulation and order dated March 5, 1998, all of the named Subtenants, except for Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group and Ron Soffer, agreed to be bound by any order I entered with respect to Fishers right to occupy t

stopher H. Martin, Jesse Siegel a/k/a Jessie Siegel, Siegel, Martin & Heilbrun, Ron Soffer, and Carmen Tausik (collectively, the "Subtenants"). The Subtenants were added as defendants after the Government learned that Fisher had sublet to them without consent of OFM. Epstein and Fisher oppose ejectment on

the Premises to the Government. Defendant Ellyn Bank ("Bank") is a resident of the State of New York with a business address at 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York. Bank is named as a defendant because she has been an unapproved occupant of the Premises; has availed herself of the use and benefits of

validity of which the Government disputes, Epstein did not consent to the use and occupancy of the Premises by Fisher's Subtenants. 14. Fisher's Subtenants hold and continue in possession of the Premises without the Government's permission or consent. 15. On or about November 18, 1997, the Government

") is a resident of the SONY_GM_02742767 EFTA _00229416 EFTA01324982 State of New York with a business address at 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York. Bank is named as a defendant because she has been an unapproved occupant of the Premises; has availed herself of the use and benefits of the Premis

e validity of which the Government disputes, Epstein did not consent to the use and occupancy of the Premises by Fisher's Subtenants. 50. Fisher's Subtenants hold and continue in possession of the Premises without the Government's permission or consent. 51. On or about November 18, 1997, the Govemment s