Epstein Secrets

etermination that Epstein had violated the agreement could the U.S. Attorney's Office move forward to prosecute Epstein. See generally Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971). Finally and most fundamentally, Epstein has it entirely within his power to avoid criminal prosecution by complying with non-

trike all references to a "non- prosecution agreement" contained in defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") Motion to Stay these proceedings. Under the Best Evidence Rule, Fed. R. Evid. 1002, and the principles underlying the rule, Epstein is required to produce the written agreement (or a copy thereof) rather than s

etermination that Epstein had violated the agreement could the U.S. Attorney's Office move forward to prosecute Epstein. See generally Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971). Finally and most fundamentally, Epstein has it entirely within his power to avoid criminal prosecution by complying with non-

Jane Doe explains in her simultaneously filed motion to strike, the Court should strike all references to the contents of the agreement because of the Best Evidence Rule, Fed. R. Evid. 1002, and the principles underlying the rule. If Epstein wants to prove that a document exists with particular language that is crea

determination that Epstein had violated the agreement could the U.S. Attorney's Office move forward to prosecute Epstein. See generally Santobellol. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971). Finally and most fundamentally, Epstein has it entirely within his power to avoid criminal prosecution by complying with non-

Jane Doe explains in her simultaneously filed motion to strike, the Court should strike all references to the contents of the agreement because of the Best Evidence Rule, Fed. R. Evid. 1002, and the principles underlying the rule. If Epstein wants to prove that a document exists with particular language that is crea