Epstein Secrets

e when substituted service is used to serve a defendant. While Rule 4(eX1) allows Plaintiff to serve process on Defendant in the method permitted by New York, Rule 4(e)(1) does not alter the twenty day period specified by Rule 12(a). In other words, under Rules 4(e)(1) and 12(a), the Court is not bound by

Rule 4(e)(1) does not alter the twenty day period specified by Rule 12(a). In other words, under Rules 4(e)(1) and 12(a), the Court is not bound by New York's proof of service filing requirement nor New York's "completion" date in determining when Defendant's answer needed to be filed. Beller & Keller" Ty

ument 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'16/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80381-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT THIS CAUSE comes before the Co

to date there has been no action taken on that Motion. 'Service can also be made on the Defendant in this case under Florida law or under the law of New York, where the service was made. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(2)(A). Florida law is substantially the same as federal law, as it allows service on a person 15 years o

t 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06)11.2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT, OR ALTERNATIVE

ing the big logos. the big movie projection company. Matter of fact, my son. when he graduate. he went to work for Mark for about couple months in New York as a -- as a -- as a trainee. I don't think he ever got paid. but he -- he was trying to learn the business and Mark gave hint a job. That was for

Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No.08•CV.80119•CIV•MARRAIJOIINSON JANE DOE NO. 2. Plaintiff. n. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Defendant. Related cases: 08.10232. 0840360. 9840381 08.10994. 0640993. 0840811. 08.80893. 09.80169. 09.10

York, and that no competent defense counsel negotiating in good faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe

e. Thank you. THE COURT: Thanks very much. MR. EDWARDS: I believe my next client who is going to speak is probably going to speak as Jane Doe. JANE DOE NO. 1: Yes, Jane Doe. THE COURT: We'll say Jane Doe No. 1, just for the record. JANE DOE NO. 1: Okay. Thank you for allowing us to speak today.