7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
ting in good the Florida prosecutors and and that no competent faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe
judgment with his own independent investigation. THE COURT: OK. MR. WEINBERG: If I could just add one precedent, your Honor. The Chief judge in the District of Massachusetts or the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, in a case called U.S. v. Fleming, when the conditions at Walpole, which is a state prison where federa
ting in good the Florida prosecutors and and that no competent faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe
judgment with his own independent investigation. THE COURT: OK. MR. WEINBERG: If I could just add one precedent, your Honor. The Chief judge in the District of Massachusetts or the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, in a case called U.S. v. Fleming, when the conditions at Walpole, which is a state prison where federa
ting in good the Florida prosecutors and and that no competent faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe
nity to make a judgment with his own independent investigation. THE COURT: OK. If I could just add one precedent, your Honor. The Chief judge in the District of Massachusetts or the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, in a case called U.S. v. Fleming, when the conditions at Walpole, which is a state prison where federa
ting in good the Florida prosecutors and and that no competent faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe
judgment with his own independent investigation. THE COURT: OK. MR. WEINBERG: If I could just add one precedent, your Honor. The Chief judge in the District of Massachusetts or the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, in a case called U.S. v. Fleming, when the conditions at Walpole, which is a state prison where federa
ting in good the Florida prosecutors and and that no competent faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe
judgment with his own independent investigation. THE COURT: OK. MR. WEINBERG: If I could just add one precedent, your Honor. The Chief judge in the District of Massachusetts or the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, in a case called U.S. v. Fleming, when the conditions at Walpole, which is a state prison where federa
8 U.S.C. § 2423(b). Jane Does #1 through #19 were all minors at the time of their involvement with defendant Epstein. Jane Doe #11 was a resident of New York; the remaining Jane Does were all residents of Palm Beach County, Florida, at the time of their involvement with defendant Epstein. Count 1 carries
No. 84-1745. Heard Jan. 10, 1985. Decided Feb. 25, 1985. An accused sought release from pretrial detention. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, David S. Nelson, J., applying the Bail Reform Act of 1984, ordered that accused remain in cus- tody. Accused appealed on ground that the Bail Ref
York, and that no competent defense counsel negotiating in good faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe
ake a judgment with his own independent investigation. THE COURT: OK. MR. WEINBERG: If I could just add one precedent, your Honor. The Chief judge in the District of Massachusetts or the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, in a case called U.S, v. Fleming, when the conditions at Walpole, which is a state prison where federal p
Entities connected to both New York and the District of Massachusetts

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Donald Trump
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION
Prince Charles
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON
Lesley Groff
PERSON
Woody Allen
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON
Barry Diller
PERSON