Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00136104

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ashington Post <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/07/25/are-trump-administrations-actions-portland-legal-are- they-constitutionalk (7/25, Vladeck, 14.2M) examines the legal authority President Trump has "to deploy federal law enforcement officers to Portland, Ore., Seattle and other cities." T

bable cause and to clearly identify themselves and their agency before detaining or arresting `any person off the streets in Oregon.' In his ruling, Mosman held the AG "did not have standing to bring the case because it had not shown that the issue was 'an interest that is specific to the state itself.'

EFTA00150469

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

s not and will not police ideology." WPost Details Legal Justification For Federal Presence In Portland. In an analysis, the Washington Post (7/25, Vladeck, 14.2M) examines the legal authority President Trump has "to deploy federal law enforcement officers to Portland, Ore., Seattle and other cities."

able cause and to clearly identify themselves and their agency before detaining or arresting 'any person off the streets in Oregon." In his ruling, Mosman held the AG "did not have standing to bring the case because it had not shown that the issue was 'an interest that is specific to the state itself."

EFTA01658158

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

to clearly identify themselves and their agency before detaining or arresting 'any person off the streets in EFTA01658161 Oregon:" In his ruling, Mosman held the AG "did not have standing to bring the case because it had not shown that the issue was 'an interest that is specific to the state itself.'