Epstein Secrets

://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-florida-e2a4431f7319afd037023d9a586aa291> (11/12, Balsamo, Tucker) says a report from the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility has found Acosta "exercised 'poor judgment' in handling an investigation into wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein when he was a top federal prosecuto

y <https://www.usatoday.corn/story/news/politics/2020/11/12/election-fraud-officials-say-no- evidence-voting-systems-compromised/6272326002/> (11/12, Johnson, 10.3IM) reports that the group of agencies, which included the National Association of State Election Directors, "issued what appeared to be a def

an Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (doc. #50) with a letter just received from the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility. As the Court is aware, briefing on the victims' motion for an order directing the government not to withhold evidence was completed when the victi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 023-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR ANO OR

e non-prosecution agreement with Epstein (Request for Production No. 17). This allegation of misconduct was referred to the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility. How this complaint was investigated, and what OPR relied upon, has no relevance to the issues pending in this case. Moreover, some of Petitioners'

s not served upon the proposed intervenors. ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC 2028 Harrison St

9. The victims pointed out that the Government had admitted, in its response to the request for admission (RFA) #22, that "The Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility and/or other Government entities have collected information about .. . Bruce Reinhart's possible involvement in the Epstein matter." The victims wo

M Document 244 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF RENEWED MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. AT

roin the victims and instead urged them to have "patience...LI* J[11-.5.1 According to an internal review conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility, which was released in November 2020, Acosta showed "poor judgment" in granting Epstein a non-prosecution agreement and failing to notify Epstein'

ort Pirie via my Facebook business page. Darryll Johnson contacted me via private messenger on Facebook. After exchanging numerous messages Darn II Johnson provided his phone number. We exchanged numerous text messages after which Darryll Johnson invited me to his home in Port Pirie for a coffee to mee

litigation. 4 The Government asserts that the work•product doctrine applies to documents prepared by ('191 attorneys in the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in response to Petitioners' counsel's request for an investigation into the Government's handling of the Epstein case (DE 276-1 at 12-14). Alt

Market Land Value: $1626790 Market Improvement $17653363 Value: Total Market Value: $19280153 2: Deed Record for EAGLE County Buyer Information JOHNSON. ELIZABETH ROSS EPSTEIN. JEFFREY E 457 MADISON AVE NEW YORK, NY 10022-6843 NEW YORK Name: Name: Address: County/FIPS: Name: Address: County

his or her oath. 10 The DOD's failure to discipline its own prosecutors heightens the importance of the CVRA's private right of action. The DOD's Office of Professional Responsibility ('OPR") conducted a review of the Epstein case. While the Report found that prosecutors exercised "poor judgment; it concluded they did not commit

e in the overall statutory scheme." (quoting ! I Davis v. Mich. Dep't of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803, 809, 109 S.Ct. 1500, 103 L.Ed.2d 891 (1989))); P ° Johnson v. United States, 559 U.S. 133, 139, 130 S.Ct. 1265, 176 L.Ed.2d I (2010) ("Ultimately, context determines *1297 meaning."). Specifically, subsect

wer disclosure and retaliation complaint was also submitted by Empower to the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General (DOJ OIG) and Office of Professional Responsibility on June 28. The article quoted Leavitt, who said, "The outcomes of clearance investigations and adjudications were often pre- determined by the Divi

lli), Washington Post (07/02, Jacobs, Barrett), CNN (07/02, Reid, Valle, et al.), Washington Times (07/02, Howell Jr.), Washington Examiner (07/02, Johnson), CNBC (07/02, Breuninger), NBC News (07/02, Jarrett, Reiss, Satlin), ABC News (07/02, Katersky, Charalambous, Faulders), CBS News (07/02, Kates), B

randum Subject Jane Does Nos. 1 and 2. v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-C1V-MARRA (S.D.Fla.) Dam April 26, 2011 To From Assistant Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility U.S. Department of Justice VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS ,AUSA 99 N.E. 4 Street Miami, Florida 33132 Attached please fmd a CD-ROM containing the victims'

M Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CW-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND

randum Subject Jane Does Nos. 1 and 2.'. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA (S.D.Fla.) Daft April 26, 2011 To From Assistant Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility U.S. Department of Justice VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Attached please fmd a CD-ROM containing the victims' Moti

M Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CW-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 I. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND