4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
ntire diplomacy of freedom, were projects of folly—romantic, self deluding undertakings in the Arab world. To the extent that these men thought of the Greater Middle East, they entered it through the gateway of the Israeli-Palestinian struggle. The key to the American security dilemma in the region, they maintained,
responsible for the invasion of Iraq. To deal with the last claim first, this straw-man depiction of our argument merely confirms once again that Chait has not in fact read our book. I don't find that surprising, because a careful reading of the book would reveal to him that we weren't anti-Israel
ntire diplomacy of freedom, were projects of folly—romantic, self deluding undertakings in the Arab world. To the extent that these men thought of the Greater Middle East, they entered it through the gateway of the Israeli-Palestinian struggle. The key to the American security dilemma in the region, they maintained,
responsible for the invasion of Iraq. To deal with the last claim first, this straw-man depiction of our argument merely confirms once again that Chait has not in fact read our book. I don't find that surprising, because a careful reading of the book would reveal to him that we weren't anti-Israel
ntire diplomacy of freedom, were projects of folly—romantic, self deluding undertakings in the Arab world. To the extent that these men thought of the Greater Middle East, they entered it through the gateway of the Israeli-Palestinian struggle. The key to the American security dilemma in the region, they maintained,
responsible for the invasion of Iraq. To deal with the last claim first, this straw-man depiction of our argument merely confirms once again that Chait has not in fact read our book. I don't find that surprising, because a careful reading of the book would reveal to him that we weren't anti-Israel
ntire diplomacy of freedom, were projects of folly—romantic, self deluding undertakings in the Arab world. To the extent that these men thought of the Greater Middle East, they entered it through the gateway of the Israeli-Palestinian struggle. The key to the American security dilemma in the region, they maintained,
responsible for the invasion of Iraq. To deal with the last claim first, this straw-man depiction of our argument merely confirms once again that Chait has not in fact read our book. I don't find that surprising, because a careful reading of the book would reveal to him that we weren't anti-Israel
Entities connected to both the Greater Middle East and Chait

United States
LOCATION
Donald Trump
PERSON
Hillary Clinton
PERSON
Damascus
LOCATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Lebanon
LOCATION
Tehran
LOCATION
Bashar al-Assad
PERSON
Tunisia
LOCATION
Muammar Gaddafi
PERSON
Amr Moussa
PERSON
Cairo
LOCATION
Mumbai
LOCATION
Yemen
LOCATION
Baghdad
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Fatah
ORGANIZATIONthe Arab League
ORGANIZATION
Robert Gates
PERSON
Barack Obama
PERSON