Epstein Secrets

e Doe’s argument that “equity will do what ought to be done.” Jane Doe’s Motion to Restrain Fraudulent Transfer of Assets at 17 (citing Sterling v. Brevard County, 776 So.2d 281, 284 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000)). The only question then is “what ought to be done?” Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 217 Entered on

ive, and opportunity to fraudulently transfer assets.” Jane Doe’s Motion to Restrain Fraudulent Transfer of Assets at 11 (quoting United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2001)).2 Epstein completely misses the point of Jane Doe’s means, motive, and opportunity argument, construing it as s

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 18 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON be done." Sterling v. Brevard County, 776 So.2d 281, 284 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000). The Court should therefore also exercise its equitable powers to impose the same remedies that Jane Doe

a "perfect circumstantial evidence case that [Epstein] ha[s] means, motive, and opportunity" to fraudulently transfer assets. See United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2001) (finding probable cause for an arrest based solely on a showing of means, motive, and opportunity). The fact tha

7 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 18 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON be done." Sterling v. Brevard County, 776 So.2d 281, 284 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000). The Court should therefore also exercise its equitable powers to impose the same remedies that Jane Doe

a "perfect circumstantial evidence case that [Epstein] ha[s] means, motive, and opportunity" to fraudulently transfer assets. See United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2001) (finding probable cause for an arrest based solely on a showing of means, motive, and opportunity). The fact tha