Epstein Secrets

y was made on May 7, 2008, and proof of service was filed Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2008 Page 3 of 5 In Tyler, the court acknowledged that, because service was made in part by mail, the 1 defendant may have the benefit of three extra days to respond per Fed.

ledged that, because service was made in part by mail, the 1 defendant may have the benefit of three extra days to respond per Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e). Tyler, 120 F.3d at 26. In this case, Plaintiff’s server mailed the summons and complaint on May 5, 2008. Thus, under this scheme, Defendant would have ha

s declaration, the Court cannot determine whether “John Smith” resides at the Manhattan apartment. Further, Defendant has submitted the affidavit of Richard Barnett, who avers that he received copies of the summons and complaint on May 7, 2008, from the process server. (DE 9 Ex. A.) Because Plaintiff has provid

state law method of service and the state law provides a longer time in which to answer."). Thus, Defendant's response was due on May 27, 2007.2 'In Tyler, the court acknowledged that, because service was made in part by mail, the defendant may have the benefit of three extra days to respond per Fed. R

declaration, the Court cannot determine whether "John Smith" resides at the Manhattan apartment. Further, Defendant has submitted the affidavit of Richard Barnett, who avers that he received copies of the summons and complaint on May 7, 2008, from the process server. (DE 11 Ex. A.) Because Plaintiff has provi

tate law method of service and the state law provides a longer time in which to answer."). Thus, Defendant's response was due on May 27, 2007.' 'In Tyler, the court acknowledged that, because service was made in part by mail, the defendant may have the benefit of three extra days to respond per Fed. R

declaration, the Court cannot determine whether "John Smith" resides at the Manhattan apartment. Further, Defendant has submitted the affidavit of Richard Barnett, who avers that he received copies of the summons and complaint on May 7, 2008, from the process server. (DE 9 Ex. A.) Because Plaintiff has provid

state law method of service and the state law provides a longer time in which to answer."). Thus, Defendant's response was due on May 27, 2007.2 'In Tyler, the court acknowledged that, because service was made in part by mail, the defendant may have the benefit of three extra days to respond per Fed. R

declaration, the Court cannot determine whether "John Smith" resides at the Manhattan apartment. Further, Defendant has submitted the affidavit of Richard Barnett, who avers that he received copies of the summons and complaint on May 7, 2008, from the process server. (DE 9 Ex. A.) Because Plaintiff has provid

SDAY JULY 10, 2013 LSJ 11:OOam Je to call Leon Black ( 1:00pm Conference Call w/ 2:20pm JE to Call Mort Zuckerman THURSDAY JULY 11, 2013 LSJ and Tyler Shears EFTA00284765 4:OOpm JE to Skype w/Zaven Yaralian. Skype ID FRIDAY JULY 12, 2013 LSJ Reminder: on holiday July 12-14 SATURDAY JULY 13, 2013 LSJ

T via Jet Blue 2054 10:29pm Karyna to arrive LGA via Jet Blue 704. Citicar will pick up Karyna outside (Confirm MONDAY JULY 8, 2013 LSJ Reminder: Rich Barnett on holiday July 8-16. Back at work July 17 1:00pm to arrive STT via AA655 12:00 Call Marty Weinberg 1:30 Call Reid Weingarten 1:45 Call Alan Der