Epstein Secrets

Gonzalez v. Fresenius Medical Cam North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 763 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted) (emphasis added). See, e.g., Ventura v. Brosky, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (granting a stay of civil proceedings where civil defendant was incarcerated and awaiting trial on para

n defending the civil claims in that he has no idea what the USAO will define as a breach in the event he does not assert his 5th Amendment rights? Epstein Motion to Stay at 2. Epstein goes on to state: 'As an example, the USAO has already claimed that Epstein violated the [non-prosecution agreement) by: 1. Investiga

Gonzalez v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 763 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted) (emphasis added). See, e.g., Ventura v. Brosky, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (granting a stay of civil proceedings where civil defendant was incarcerated and awaiting trial on para

defending the civil claims in that he has no Idea what the USAO will define as a breach in the event he does not assert his 5th Amendment rights." Epstein Motion to Stay at 2. Epstein goes on to state: "As an example, the USAO has already claimed that Epstein violated the [non-prosecution agreement] by: 1. Investiga

lf- incrimination or losing the civil case in [summary proceedings]"). The cases relied upon by Defendant are consistent with these authorities. In. Ventura v. Brosky 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006), the Court stated the rule that a stay is warranted to avoid a situation "where a defendant in both crim

er plaintiffs. Finally, Epstein concedes that the Court should consider 'the interest of the public" in being the litigation to a rapid conclusion. Epstein Motion to Stay at 6. As the Court is aware, this case involves a non-prosecution agreement with a politically- connected billionaire that has drawn considerable pu

Gonzalez I. Fresenius Medical Care North America, 571 F.Supp.2d 758, 763 (W.D. Tex. 2008) (internal quotation omitted) (emphasis added). See, e.g., Ventura Brosky, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (granting a stay of civil proceedings where civil defendant was incarcerated and awaiting trial on parall

defending the civil claims in that he has no idea what the USAO will define as a breach in the event he does not assert his 5th Amendment rights." Epstein Motion to Stay at 2. Epstein goes on to state: "As an example, the USAO has already claimed that Epstein violated the [non-prosecution agreement] by: 1. Investiga